Skip to main content
TrustRadius
UserTesting

UserTesting

Overview

What is UserTesting?

UserTesting aims to enable every organization to deliver the best customer experience powered by human insight. The vendor states that with UserTesting’s on-demand Human Insight Platform, companies across industries can make accurate customer-first decisions at every level, at the speed…

Read more
Recent Reviews

Helpful in every way!

9 out of 10
April 12, 2024
Incentivized
UserTesting can be a powerful tool to understand how real people experience my organization's software. Here's how I leverage it within my …
Continue reading
Read all reviews

Awards

Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards

Reviewer Pros & Cons

View all pros & cons
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing
N/A
Unavailable

What is UserTesting?

UserTesting aims to enable every organization to deliver the best customer experience powered by human insight. The vendor states that with UserTesting’s on-demand Human Insight Platform, companies across industries can make accurate customer-first decisions at every level, at the speed business…

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee
For the latest information on pricing, visithttps://www.usertesting.com/plans

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?

62 people also want pricing

Alternatives Pricing

What is TryMyUI?

TryMyUI.com is a remote usability testing platform that offers affordable, cross-platform services for testing and improving the user experience. The product allows you to watch videos of real people using your website or app to see where (and why) users get frustrated, lost, or confused. People…

Return to navigation

Product Details

What is UserTesting?

UserTesting aims to enable every organization to deliver the best customer experience powered by human insight. The vendor states that with UserTesting’s on-demand Human Insight Platform, companies across industries can make accurate customer-first decisions at every level, at the speed business demands.

UserTesting Screenshots

Screenshot of UserTesting's several solutions for gathering rich customer experience narratives.Screenshot of Interactive Path Flows
Built on recent research in data mining, the Interactive Path Flow aggregates interaction data across multiple participant sessions to visualize the customer journey, surface unexpected behaviors, and locate key moments in the customer journey.Screenshot of Keyword Mapping
Similar keywords are automatically grouped based on overall sentiment (positive, negative, or neutral) to identify themes. Highlight reels associated with each keyword are grouped together, to discover the why behind each sentiment.Screenshot of Video capture and live streaming
Digital and real-world customer experiences are recorded on desktop and mobile devices or live streamed for in-platform viewing.Screenshot of Audience targeting
Audiences are specified by screening contributors from UserTesting’s global network of contributors or connecting to any preferred network.

UserTesting Technical Details

Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo
Supported CountriesNorth America, APAC, EMEA
Supported LanguagesEnglish, French, German
Security

Frequently Asked Questions

Userlytics, TryMyUI, and dscout are common alternatives for UserTesting.

Reviewers rate Implementation Rating highest, with a score of 9.1.

The most common users of UserTesting are from Enterprises (1,001+ employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(228)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-25 of 87)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
April 12, 2024

Helpful in every way!

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
UserTesting can be a powerful tool to understand how real people experience my organization's software. Here's how I leverage it within my team. I start by defining clear goals for my user testing session. What specific questions do I have about user behaviour? UserTesting offers its participant pool, or I can recruit my testers based on my target audience. Once participants are selected, I'll create a test scenario with tasks for users to complete while interacting with the interface. The beauty of UserTesting is that it facilitates remote, unmoderated sessions. Users complete the tasks on their own while recording their screen and audio. This allows me to observe genuine user reactions and thought processes without influencing their experience. After the test, UserTesting provides recordings of each participant's session. I can watch them individually or share them with my team. As I analyze the recordings, I pay attention to areas where users struggle or hesitate. This can reveal issues with the interface's usability. UserTesting also offers tools to highlight key moments and create clips for easy reference and discussion with my colleagues. By synthesizing the findings from the user testing sessions, I can identify opportunities to improve the user experience. UserTesting empowers my organization to make data-driven decisions based on real user behaviour.
  • unmoderated sessions
  • highlights of the key moments in the recorded session
  • replacing participants in case of unsuccessful session
  • improve the audience so we can target even more specific groups
  • AI powered analysis of the sessions with data put into affinity diagrams
  • verification of the participants, make sure people pot more or less true data about themselves
It's the best for A/B tests or tests where you need a broad audience. If you don't need a real niche audience (that you should recruit then rather yourself), then you can rely on UserTesting. It's good because it's so quick, almost instant, it takes about 10 minutes on average before I can start reviewing and documenting sessions.
Anna Baumbach | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Our UX/UI team uses UserTesting regularly to conduct research studies. We have used different features, from unmoderated tests like A/B testing or prototype tests to live User Interviews. We enjoy the pool of candidates that are found within a few minutes of the test launch. Why do we use it? To talk to users within our industry to understand their needs, motivations, and expectations when using products like ours. We believe this tool is currently the best option on the market to combine all of our research efforts. The only struggle is the limited amount of pre-screener questions and the limitations within Canada (provinces/terretories).
  • Intuitive software
  • Easy onboarding
  • Fast participant recruitment
  • Easy scheduling
  • Confidentiality agreement toggle - Name might be confusing when used for other documents like NDAs or Privacy Policies
  • Recruitment in Canada - balanced demographic within provinces/ territories
Any research efforts are met perfectly with this tool. We can do moderated or unmoderated sessions and utilize the transcript for quotes. For live sessions like User Interviews, we also like the option to have a note taker in the call that the participant is unaware off. We believe this created less stress on the participant. As mentioned before, the only problem we are facing as a Canadian company is the pre screening process. We would like to have participants represented from within all our provinces and territories. This causes us to launch multiple tests and then reject/accept a certain province for each one.
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
UserTesting is used across the user experience team at my company to answer the research questions that we have across our product teams that we support. We use it for a variety of research methods from unmoderated to moderated, generative to evaluative, and more. The problems that the platform helps us solve are the ability to test our assumptions and quickly gain feedback on design concepts that influences the product decisions that our teams makes.
  • Finding niche audiences
  • Ability to collaborate with other UX teammates or product partners
  • Quickly getting insights
  • Expanding their panel of healthcare users and customers
  • Better validation that users are who they say they are
  • More accurate and helpful sentiment analysis on sessions
UserTesting is a great way to quickly gain user or customer feedback in both generative and evaluative research studies. Want to better understand who your users are but don't have time to be on moderated interviews, UserTesting can help. Want to gain early feedback on design concepts, they can help you there too.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
My team uses UserTesting to conduct moderated and unmoderated usability testing and interviews. The platform solves for not having to manage your own recruitment and incentivization processes. It also helps with the recording and analysis process post-facilitation.
  • Recruitment (broad and vast panel audience)
  • Incentivization
  • Fast-paced and smooth end-to-end delivery
  • Recording
  • Transcription
  • Inviting team members to observe live or asynchronously
  • AI-powered Sentiment Analysis
  • Managing clip snippets
  • Cross-timezone scheduling - On the participant scheduling page, it always defaults to Pacific Time (PT). If participants don't notice this and miss my instructions, they'll go ahead and schedule in PT, even if they're in a different timezone, resulting in having to reschedule their session, which is very cumbersome and time-consuming.
  • Duration of Sessions - You only offer pre-set durations, such as 30 mins and 60 mins, if I recall correctly. Please allow us to select our own durations, such as 45 mins. Also, once the "timer" is up, Zoom just ends the session automatically, which is problematic when often times the sessions go over the allotment, resulting in an abrupt ending.
UserTesting is the best tool I've worked with for facilitating any research projects - ranging from discovery to evaluative research. I appreciate that it offers a variety of methods, beyond just usability testing. It also includes newer features like card sorting and tree testing. By integrating these features, it negates the need to use another tool such as OptimalWorkshop for which your team may not have a license.
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Our team has been leveraging usertesting.com for conducting all the unmoderated and moderated research. The tool is pretty intuitive and helps our designer able to conduct the unmoderated tests without any support. The team at usertesting.com has been immensely helpful in working with us in putting together the right set of documentation which standardizes our overall research operations. Their acquisition of UserZoom has also integrated all our userbase into one. I highly recommend usertesting.com to others! We did evaluate other tools but the quality of the product, easy integration w/Figma and their Support system makes this an absolute 10/10!
  • Support system
  • Intuitive and easy to learn
  • Their certification process giving our users industry wide recognition
  • Not really with usertesting but there are opportunities with their integrations w/Figma
Best suited for researchers to conduct moderated tests and UX designers to conduct unmoderated tests! Not suited for diary studies!
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
UserTesting gives us access to general consumer panels that we otherwise would have no way to communicate with, let alone efficiently recruit for research. UserTesting also allows us to conduct a variety of methods including (but not limited to) moderated interviews, unmoderated usability testing, cart sorts, and more. One of the features we find most beneficial with UserTesting is its out-of-the-box panel filtration and custom screening capabilities, both of which help us recruit the most appropriate research candidates based on learning objectives and timelines.
  • Effective panel recruitment
  • Quick, informative, & friendly customer service
  • Smooth unmoderated usability testing
  • Highlight reel creation
  • Straightforward test creation
  • Card sorting feature
  • Ability to re-launch tests myself that aren't picking up participants as quickly as I'd like
Most appropriate for:
-Panel recruitment
-Unmoderated usability testing
-Quick tests
-Moderated interviews
-Unmoderated interviews

Less appropriate for:
-Card sorts
-Surveys
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
As a UX Designer, I have completed an internal course that allows me to set up my own tests with the guidance of an assigned UX Researcher. I mainly use UserTesting to test design concepts we are currently ideating on to learn how participants interact with our prototypes. So far I have launched unmoderated card sorts and usability tests and both have helped give me the information I need to either start designing solutions, or go forward with the solution I had already proposed.
  • Ease of use to set up tests
  • Time stamping transcriptions
  • Connecting the correct participants based off screener
  • Updates sent to email once a test is completed
  • The word cloud function isn't very accurate.
  • Personally, I wish participants didn't have to open a Figma prototype link in a separate tab. I wish it could stay in UserTesting so they don't have to hop between tabs.
  • Having certain filters set to default sometimes slip by me. I wish those had no default and were required so I can be sure to not skip over it.
UserTesting is great to help designers get validation on their designs to see if they are initiative or user friendly, however it can also determine if a design needs more work if participants have trouble using/understanding it. At my company, we tend to test after ideation and solutioning to help validate which concept to go forward with, but I am hoping in the future we can start testing early on in the ideation phase to help us get enough supporting evidence to determine whether or not we should explore a design further to create a better case with product and tech folks.
Gonzalo M. Gonzales | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
UserTesting allows me to create moderated and non-moderated usability tests quickly and easily. I don't need to worry about recruiting participants as they have a very wide range of participants available.
  • Recruitment
  • Setting up usability tests
  • Transcritpion
  • Using better AI for transcription
  • Sometimes it's buggy when setting up a test
  • It doesn't really work as a repository
UserTesting solves the problem of recruitment. Thanks to UserTesting I can recruit participants from different countries around the world with the characteristics I need. Recruitment is a very difficult process for a small research team and I sometimes still struggle with that; for example, when recruiting minors for research. But not having to do the whole recruitment and reward process is a huge benefit.
Score 2 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Evaluating new product features with real users: UserTesting helps us gather feedback on new product features before they are released to the general public. We create tests for specific user flows and invite participants to provide feedback on their experience using the feature. This allows us to identify any issues or pain points early on and make necessary adjustments before releasing the feature.
  • easy setup of ux testing
  • recording of videos
  • Testers quality has degraded over time and they could benefit from acquiring more motivated testers
  • Make it easier to distribute mobile app builds
  • Tester sometimes don't answer screener questions truthfully creating unnecessary work for our team
Well-suited scenarios
Basic and quick user testing for general user segments: UserTesting is great for getting quick and basic feedback on general user segments. It is easy to set up and can provide valuable insights into the user experience of a product.Testing specific features or user flows: UserTesting can be effective in evaluating the usability of specific features or user flows. This can help identify any issues or pain points that need to be addressed.

Less appropriate scenarios
Requiring specific user segments: If you require testers from a specific demographic or with certain qualifications, UserTesting may not be the best option. In my experience, relying on UserTesting to recruit specific user segments often resulted in low quality testers and unreliable feedback.In-depth research: UserTesting may not be suitable for conducting in-depth research. If you need more detailed feedback or want to conduct more complex studies, it may be better to use other research methods or tools.
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
I use it for quick unmoderated user feedback on live sites and prototypes. We use the feedback to guide development decisions to make sure that they are in line with user needs and goals.
  • Recruitment
  • Unmoderated
  • Customer service
  • Broader offering of of types of questions and response types. Current selection is just to limited.
It just makes it really easy to quickly gather feedback from contributors. For US markets I normally get 10 respondents within 2 hours of launching the study. The turn around time is great in a last minute thinking culture at times. I extensively use use and appreciate the pre-panel filters, super easy and helpful.
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We use UserTesting to get feedback from live consumers/users of our websites and products. We’ve used the available community and also done private groups with both non-moderated (self-guided) tests and moderated tests. <div><br></div><div>We’ve ran tests to get feedback on website redesigns and enhancements including site architecture/structure, UI/UX, content, and style/colors. </div><div><br></div><div>It has been immensely helpful in getting user feedback quickly and easily to drive changes. </div>
  • Available Tester Pool
  • Ease of Use
  • Speed to market
  • Coordination/ease of use for private testers
  • Ability to establish micro tests/segments
  • Non-licensed viewing of results
UserTesting allows me and my team to create and complete user tests incredibly quickly and cheaply. User testing used to be incredibly expensive and time consuming and as such wasn’t completed as often as it should have been.

With UserTesting, we can set up, deploy, and get results within ONE WEEK with no extra costs beyond what we pay for the service. It’s a true game changer to get voice of the customer feedback in near real-time and get feedback more often.
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We use it mostly for unmoderated testing to see usage, workflow, and pain points encountered on our site as well as uploading interviews to create clips.
  • I particularly like the note taking feature, that you're able to export the notes and has time stamps for the notes.
  • I like that it is relatively fast to recruit users.
  • It is pretty simple to set up a user test: the tasks.
  • The UI ironically is a bit difficult to use. Sometimes its difficult to navigate around.
  • The tagging feature could be really useful, but it doesn't allow you to create tags for projects (only tags that go across all of your projects) so it makes it difficult to use.
  • Creating reels could also be better. Similarly it isn't by project so it can be tedious to create them because you have to look through so many clips.
  • It doesn't allow you to collaboratively take notes in a live session. It would be really useful to be able to use it like an observation room and have participants take notes that are time stamped.
Best suited: low complexity user testing of a prototype or live site. Less appropriate: user tests that are more foundational in nature and require follow up questions, as well as testing complicated flows in prototypes because you can't course correct participants easily.
Alex Jones | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
UserTesting is mainly used by our UX team (designers, writers, researchers) to inform the development of our Hi-Fi designs and content. It allows us to see whether users understand and like the designs before releasing updates to our app and onboarding journey. Members of the marketing team also use it in order to test different campaign designs and messaging.
  • Very fast responses from users
  • Very detailed qualitative feedback
  • Easy to use and set-up
  • The export to Excel function could be improved. It works, but I often have to manipulate it when analysing.
Really good for getting super-fast feedback to help sense-check that your designs are heading in the right direction. As a default you are able to record the user's face (as well as their screen) which makes for really engaging video recordings to analyse. Verbal feedback is automatically transcribed and there is an automated sentiment feature which helps identify problems to rectify really quickly.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We use UserTesting to validate product ideas, test our product's usability and iterate on product designs. UserTesting helps us see the usability issues of our product that are otherwise hard to see. We may be biased against our own product, or because we are too familiar it prevents us from seeing these issues. UserTesting also helps us minimize the time spent on usability tests as it enables us to do unmoderated tests with the demographic of our choice.
  • Taking notes with video clips. I can take notes while I am watching a session and I can create clips of UX issues or bugs occurring. This really helps when I share them with other teams.
  • Exporting all your notes. I analyze all usability tests by exporting my notes from UserTesting. I wish I could bulk export multiple tests though.
  • Setting up demographics. This helps me reach out to users who are similar to our audience.
  • Setting up screeners. Some studies require specific audiences (using a specific tool etc.), by setting screeners I can make sure I reached the correct audience.
  • Bulk exporting multiple tests.
  • I believe some contributors are lying on their demographic info. Sometimes when I try to reach native English speakers or another language, I come across users who are not native speakers even though I set up demographics accordingly.
UserTesting is ideal for big companies that work in an agile setting. If you are working in a fast paces environment and need to get some insights fast, UserTesting helps a lot. If you are creative, and know how to ask questions, you would be surprised how fast UserTesting starts to show its value. We are a small team and we try to minimize our work load as much as we can by optimizing our research operations, so making unmoderated tests are very important to us. If you are a small company with limited resources though, it might be expensive. Then, buying multiple tools that cover different areas might actually become more affordable.
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Game changing speed to insight. User Testing allows us to quickly have confidence in our designs and quickly pivot if not meeting our users needs. This saves time not only in the UX team but also when it comes to development. User Testing also allows us to have much richer behaviour data to support the why behind out design thinking.
  • Speed to insight
  • Confidence in design
  • Further integration with other design tools
We use UT in all areas of our design and development process.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We use UserTesting for discovery interviews with users as well as for usability testing.
  • Creating clips and highlight reels of recorded interviews--these really help you "land" the research findings with stakeholders.
  • Capturing a blend of qual and quant in unmoderated interviews. They've been continuously improving the quality of visuals, so it can sometimes be a simple drag and drop into a report!
  • The technical and account support teams are second to none. Response times and even resolution of issues is usually same day.
  • They've come in to do product onboarding and trainings for our teams which allows our research team to keep driving research while expanding what our "people who sometimes do research" are able to take on.
  • Need additional data visualizations for card sorts.
  • Customize scales (5 pt vs 7 pt) for built in likert scale questions and customized responses for success question.
It's a fantastic platform for remote qualitative interviews, both moderated and unmoderated. It allows you some organizational capabilities with data, but is not sufficient as a repository.
December 03, 2022

Great Tool!

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Great tool! UserTesting allowed me to conduct research studies easily and quickly. After launching a study I can get responses back within 2 hours. The quality of participants is great. The tool allowed me to get valuable feedback from participants and saved me so much time with the unmoderated studies. It is easy to save and share clips, it allowed me to share great clips with my stakeholders when presenting the final report
  • Easy to setup a study
  • Getting quick responses
  • Great education resources
  • Integrated Click Test
  • combine 2 5-seconds test
  • better visuals for the Tree Test
It is good tool to talk to customers of a competitor products and understand the strength and weaknesses
Conduct exploratory research to learn what potential users will need or how to improve a current product
Conduct usability studies and short studied to test certain design ideas and prototypes before commiting to the idea
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
I am a UX Designer at a local transportation company where we offer both local bus service and city-to-city coach throughout the UK. Customers can purchase tickets easily through our app and website therefore it is vital that we ensure our platforms are user-friendly. I have been with UserTesting for over a year and I usually use it to conduct unmoderated tasks where the participants will complete tasks on the functional prototype and give their genuine feedback.
  • Quick feedback.
  • Participants recruitment.
  • Customer support.
  • Recruiting the right participants (often some do not speak throughout the test).
  • Some templates are not customizable.
For people who have zero experience when it comes to designing a usability test, the UserTesting platform will be a good start as it is beginner friendly. UserTesting platform is quick to learn how the platform works as the interface is minimal, it also provides courses where they give walk new users through the features. However, when it comes to asking the right questions to get a genuine reaction from the participants, new users should learn how to avoid steering participants in a certain direction, causing them to give biased answers.
Joshua Rodriguez | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
I have used UserTesting as both a user and a company working with users. From the user side, it is an easy process to find relevant tests to take that match my skill set. As a company I have used UserTesting to review landing pages on my website to get feedback from potential customers on design, readability, and easy of use. The problem I wanted to fix was on page time for users and clicked through to sign up for a demo upon getting the feedback I discovered that I needed to change my header section to be more clear and more concise.
  • Matches you with potential users that are relevant to your customer base
  • Allows you set up a very detailed process to get amazing feedback on your site
  • Provides video reviews from users so you can easily walk through their process
  • Improving the live walkthrough feature if users can review in real-time via live streaming
UserTesting is perfect for landing page reviews, product comparisons, copy editing and focus group work. I set up a multi-varied landing page sequence and had users walk through the different versions of the pages to see which one was the easiest to understand. Hearing feedback on the title copy which was clear to me but not clear to the user helped me realize how I could clarify and simplify my page copy to make sure users can navigate the site knowing what to expect upon signing up.
Eva Sawyer | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
I do all the web design for my company myself, so I often second guess if the site is laid out well. Just because I think that it is clear doesn't always mean that it is, so user testing is important for me to get feedback.

Here is my big problem with the software - it is prohibitively expensive for small businesses. They used to offer a one-off free test that would give me a rough idea of where to start, and then it was a more affordable pricing structure if you only wanted one or two tests. Now the only option is an expensive monthly payment, in the hundreds of dollars. To be fair, virtually all other companies are the same - but it is not affordable at all for smaller businesses.
  • Great ability to target audience.
  • Great flexibility of questions to ask.
  • PRICE!
  • Options for smaller business.
Honestly, the functionality of this software is one of the best on the market. It does an incredible job of really dialing in on what you want to know and getting access to testers.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
It is being used for user research and usability testing. Solves the problem of screening people to talking to and reaching out to participants from all across the country. The XD team are the ones primarily using UserTesting for the design and research work around user experience design.
  • Screening criteria.
  • Test writing format is very easy.
  • Analysis is super easy.
  • Can be slightly more affordable for smaller companies to afford it.
  • Should have budget friendly options for smaller teams who don’t have funding.
  • More logins for larger teams for more people to run tests even though testing volume could potentially be low.
Best suited to get quick results where protons are up and ready to go for testing. Not that great for native mobile app test prototypes to emulate the swipe and side scroll action. Dev teams and security teams are apprehensive of using the SDK, so a workaround for that would be appreciated.
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We use UserTesting for, I would estimate, 90% of the user experience research we do globally. Without UserTesting, I think we would struggle to gather and act on any insights at all. I recommend UserTesting because of the speed at which I can deliver insights to my teams. Not everyone in an organization understands how user research can help them and with UserTesting, I can 'sell' research to them by delivering feedback on a product from customers, usually on the same day. For my internal customers who know little to nothing about research and whose only experience with feedback might be from polls or a customer service desk, this is revolutionary. It makes me look good, builds trust and credibility, and it allows me to continue to work with that client on more complex problems down the road.
  • Delivers participants, often in the same day
  • Delivers participants who meet my criteria
  • Delivers audio and video of a session (can't live without that)
  • Is flexible enough in allowing me to setup a test in many different ways
  • Let me go back farther than past 10 tests when I exclude participants; just let me choose which tests I want to exclude from or make it specific to my folder(s), not the whole org
  • Would like to see more quant type metrics
  • Make it easier to manage my templates; don't want them mixed up with the whole org's
In my experience, UserTesting is most successful when you have a working prototype ... although that speaks more to the participants, maybe, than it does to the platform. It just makes it easier on the participants when you can have over a few screens that work with links and users can navigate so that they don't have to image or guess. However, with that said, I almost never have a working prototype and often need to use static screens and I have to ask users to guess where a link will take them and that's also very successful. Sometimes, I even use UserTesting to ask customers questions without showing anything at all. I do that rarely but when I need a quick answer, I know UserTesting can deliver.
March 30, 2022

Why UserTesting

Wayne Pulford | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
I use UserTesting in my organization to determine customer feedback on checkout services. One of the main business problems that are addressed is customers' thoughts and feelings behind certain aspects of the checkout service. Do they like how it looks? what does it mean to them? is it easy to use? etc.
  • There are guides available for support
  • Good for qualitative research
  • The 'think out loud' test results are useful for providing information on how the customer is feeling which helps us to understand the customer's journey
  • Enables empathy of the customers
  • Easier way to use templates
  • Transcripts can sometimes be difficult to interpret due to accents
  • some quantative research options as well as qualitative
When running a test on the first impression of a product then user testing has been beneficial, if a product is not right from the first stage then there is more that is going to need to be changed. Having customer feedback at the start can also help to move the product forward and shape the next stage.
March 23, 2022

A no-brainer

Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
My UX team, and our director of consumer insights has been using UserTesting for about about two years now, internally. The information we gleam has been invaluable, especially in 2020 when in-person focus groups are difficult to host. We have been able to catch and correct design issues before launch, pivot on design decisions, listen to users' "thoughts" as they complete surveys, listen and watch them complete card sorts for our IA. The options and uses are endless.
  • Flexibility- you can do so much with the tool - it's really is up to you.
  • Support - between the commUnity, UserTesting University, and their support team, I feel very supported in my testing and never feel "lost."
  • Collaboration - it's easy to help my colleagues build out their tests.
  • Because its so vast - it can be easy to get lost, and overwhelmed.
  • It can be time consuming to go through all the recordings individually.
  • The way the tests are organized can be confusing - could work on better organization or filtering to find tests.
I've used UserTesting to test for and against situations. I've used it to prove why we should kill off a feature, and to support how our IA should be organized. I've used it for discovery, and seeing how users prefer to shop. When testing prototypes, I would love to see a better, or more easier, solution for InVision, and prototyping.
Anthony Rezendes | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
UserTesting was our primary vehicle for testing our designs – whether it was A/B testing concepts, usability studies for in-market products, or testing our hypotheses. The platform helped us increase speed to outcomes, which historically had been a laborious process that often took weeks. We would literally construct and run a test and within a day we'd have robust data on user sentiment we could analyze. In-app tools including charts and summaries helped us unpack usability issues or wayfinding challenges observed in our UIs. As the Sr. UX Manager under product, UserTesting became an indispensable tool my entire team relied on to uncover possibilities.
  • Speed at which testing can be run
  • Large pool of potential consumers to test against
  • Platform ease of use
  • Incredible help and responsive support staff
  • Resources to deepen understanding including certification
  • Misinterpretation of the data by inexperienced teams
  • Better mobile support
The application is well suited for scenarios in which qualitative feedback is needed quickly. It allows teams to target specific demographic populations that further increase the likelihood of getting relevant feedback. In creating a cohort of panelists, there are robust features that enable companies to narrow audience segments by age range, industry, salary range, regions of the country, etc.. UserTesting even allows for the ability to build your own customized groups. One of the challenges and a potential area of growth could be making it easier to find niche audiences. For example, we needed to test C-suite executives within financial institutions. We ended up relying more on our relationships with these folks when it came to getting the data we needed.
Return to navigation